mlerules: (tools)
[personal profile] mlerules
A friend is currently mulling over an idea for a film with a completely off-stage main villain. This is what he says and I'm spreading the question further w/this post:

I can think of a couple of examples of this that, in my opinion, don't work well (Blair Witch Project springs to mind, as does one horrific Enterprise episode), but I'm at a loss for examples of people who've done it well. As a general rule, if the audience doesn't ultimately confront the villain (vicariously through the main characters, of course) they're left feeling unsatisfied with the narrative. But for every rule there's an exception, so I'm sure they must be out there.

So, can anyone out there come up with an example (preferably on screen, but also in prose, and preferably in science fiction, comedy, or drama and not horror) where the non-appearance of the antagonist is either not a hinderance or actually an enhancement to the storytelling?

Date: 2009-11-17 12:06 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jimkeller.livejournal.com
Hmm, I'm going to have to see if I can track down The Sandbaggers. What others do to creatively work around budget constrictions is always enlightening.

Date: 2009-11-17 12:31 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] argentla.livejournal.com
It's all on DVD from Netflix; I just finished it.

The interesting thing is that they do some location scenes, although most of the action takes place in the permanent sets of the SIS offices. Their biggest economy measure, so far as I could see, was to be quite ruthless about the number of characters, especially in the first series. They had seven or eight regular, recurring characters, and a very, very small number of guest stars per episode. (In the second episode, for instance, the plot concerns the rescue of a group of Norwegian technicians whose plane has crashed in Soviet territory; we actually see the technicians, but they have no dialogue, so they're represented by extras.) There a number of times when it's quite surprising. For example, Neil Burnside, the main character, was previously married, and his wife divorced him for being an insufferable workaholic (and generally insufferable). His ex-father-in-law, who's the Home Office permanent undersecretary, is a recurring character, and his ex-mother-in-law appears two or three times, but his ex-wife never appears in any form.

In a way, it adds to the realism of the atmosphere, because you get a clear sense of the way these life-or-death decisions are often made by a few people in great isolation, where they don't necessarily know what's happening on the ground. (The creator was an ex-SIS officer, and the reason the show ended in 1980 was that he mysteriously disappeared.)

Profile

mlerules: (Default)
mlerules

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 26th, 2025 09:23 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios