Date: 2006-03-25 01:19 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] redefining-self.livejournal.com
“A person commits the offense of distributing unlawful sexual devices when he knowingly sells, advertises, publishes or exhibits to any person any three-dimensional device designed or marketed as useful primarily for the stimulation of human genital organs or offers to do so or possesses such devices with the intent to do so.”

So, by the strictest interpretation of this law any man is in violation right off the bat. Nearly every man has a functional (to varying degrees) penis and it is a three-dimensional device possessed by the man that has a primary function of stimulating the genitals of their partner.

I suppose it could be argued that the most common use of the penis is for urination but lets be frank - the specific design of the penis involves reproduction and currently reproduction is an outcome to sex. Sex is about stimulation (there are still some people out there who have sex strictly for the purposes of reproduction and derive no pleasure from it) and as such it can be inferred that the primary function of the penis is as a device to stimulate the genitals of a person (including the owner of the penis).

And as far as marketing purposes go the penis is solely marketed (when it is marketed at all) as a sexual device.

A poorly written law that never should have been written at all.

Date: 2006-03-25 01:23 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mlerules.livejournal.com
Yup. The 1st part, limiting the law to 3-D devices sold, advertised, published or exhibited, is fairly workable, but they lose it completely w/the last bit: "or possesses such devices with the intent to do so."

dont forget pussy!

Date: 2006-03-25 06:39 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mike-pett.livejournal.com
Vagina's seem to fall into the same scenario in my mind/hand/mouth/experience.

Re: dont forget pussy!

Date: 2006-03-25 09:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mlerules.livejournal.com
Hmm, 3-D definitely, not so sure about what's meant by DEVICE. I can wrap my head (whatEVER) 'round a cock as a device easier, for some reason.

Date: 2006-03-25 03:13 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hiddentass.livejournal.com
No, this is really nice of them.

Someday you may wish to move out of California. It's wonderful that states are making sure YOU know enough to cross them off the list saving valuable time:
S Dakota -- 'nuff said
Texas -- The group who polices alcohol use is arresting people IN BARS for being intoxicated.
OK: Books about Gays have to be kept out of reach from minors
And now Missippi.

Please note: Chains and whips, gimp masks, suspension rigs, branding tools, home tatoo kits, are all apparently legal under this law. So most of the really kinky stuff is fine. Oh, and legally I suspect that the anus is not considered genatalia - stuff designed primarally to be used here is fine.

Now, the fun question is, when some enterprising person starts making hairbrushs with interesting handles (designed primaraly for brushing hair!) what will the legislators do?

Is a 2D cutout picture of a toy illegal? How about when you stack 150 together?
--Tass

Date: 2006-03-25 09:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mlerules.livejournal.com
Ah, yes: always looking on the bright side of life - well done, sir.

Most amused by your hairbrush issue. And what of a 2-D cutout of a cock?

One point of veiw

Date: 2006-03-25 06:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mike-pett.livejournal.com
I think it is important to note that it may be that the legislature wants to push home a very valid point,

One should never use a dildo on one's siblings.

this is a really important thing and well... it's Missippi right?

M

Profile

mlerules: (Default)
mlerules

December 2025

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14 151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 25th, 2026 07:52 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios