mlerules: (rainbow fist)
mlerules ([personal profile] mlerules) wrote2010-07-08 09:42 pm

[identity profile] quetz.livejournal.com 2010-07-09 07:33 am (UTC)(link)
well, duh.

[identity profile] crboltz.livejournal.com 2010-07-09 02:36 pm (UTC)(link)
Remember this holding only applies to Section 3 (feds not recognizing same sex marriage licenses issued by the states-- and most specifically it could be interpreted to only apply to marriage licenses issued by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.) The non-portability of same sex marriages were not before the court and were not ruled on. Also, this is a low level federal ruling and the Oboma administration will almost certainly appeal it to a higher court.... which means this is much more of a tentative and hopeful: Woot!

[identity profile] mlerules.livejournal.com 2010-07-09 03:02 pm (UTC)(link)
True, but it's still helpful for others opposing to have some insight into a judge's perspective and legal arguments/reasons opposing. As you note, a tentative Woot!, but these days I need a dose of good news, ya'know. ;-)